[Openswan Users] Updating only after negotiation is complete and when loss of peer (fwd)

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
Sun Aug 15 22:26:55 CEST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


    Ted> Is their any work being done to have the RIB table updated only
    Ted> after negotiation is completed? Why have a route in the table
    Ted> if the tunnel is not completed. Been experimenting with what I

  The rational is that, once you have specified a policy for some flow,
you do not want to let packets out un-encrypted.

  This does interact poorly when you are creating redundant tunnels of
various kinds. I'd have to know more about the problem that you are
trying to solve to say more.

- --
]     "Elmo went to the wrong fundraiser" - The Simpson         |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBQSANXYqHRg3pndX9AQHhRAP/YHNbvqjkXIE6adNSdMEN1uD1lgs6Znkc
1hLEaZpGPHMdmIKc2Lr4qMS1aPeLswaQ+34/VUeA1NHTO2lg5SAcVO81n8i1bGbH
U2Pr9wJsLG7AFyDNsWaKEfjFgaT2+sVMDOtQJGO55vAurqRs8k7NEiGkebjiwo2z
FstrFzM0VPE=
=XZNC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Users mailing list