[Openswan dev] 2.1.0rc1 and nat-t patch
Michael Richardson
mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
Thu Mar 11 19:10:07 CET 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "gary" == gary ng <garyng2000 at yahoo.com> writes:
gary> I tried the kern.patch but it doesn't include nat-t as far as
gary> I can tell(nothing changes net/ipv4/udp.c).
gary> I then download the full 2.1.0rc1 tree and try a 'make
gary> menugo', again nat-t is not included in the patch.
gary> After briefly browse through the Makefile, I add the 'make
gary> nattpatch ...' under applypatch and now the nat-t patch goes
gary> in.
gary> Have I overlooked something in the documentation or is this
gary> the right way to do it ?
It is the right way.
If we included it in the basic kernel patch, then it would fail on any
system/distro that had included the udp.c patch.
The documentation needs work.
- --
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr at xelerance.com http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBQFD/3oqHRg3pndX9AQHoPwP6AhtKH30cLES3iwSVyYtVUgvEgmO7Gvh7
UZs5pFXKwzMZy5c3aAEExOkDCFgNlK0kk5eSPjb027k5Cccdg7YF4vrKIAnv41cY
wCTekCT77EUgWv9t+klxn8Ud5S1ybk8tJDjXeHLR/yP1HhwI9zwIvDyv0fTz4IFy
Mtu0n/XG+As=
=p44G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Dev
mailing list