[Openswan Users] openswan problem + crash kernel
alireza sadeh seighalan
seighalani at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 10:56:04 EDT 2012
hi everyone
i configured openswan + xl2tpd ( for l2tp over ipsec vpn server) but when i
want to connect to server i recieve error 809 or 619 after that kernel
crashed. what should i do? thanks in advance
dentos: 6.2
openswan: 2.6.32-18.el6_3.i686
xl2tpd: 1.3.1-4.el6.i686
kernel:2.6.32-279.5.1.el6.i686
Linux Openswan U2.6.32/K2.6.32-279.5.1.el6.i686 (netkey)
attach: kernel crash image
[root at Hi-ali ~]# xl2tpd -D
xl2tpd[3392]: setsockopt recvref[30]: Protocol not available
xl2tpd[3392]: Using l2tp kernel support.
xl2tpd[3392]: xl2tpd version xl2tpd-1.3.1 started on Hi-ali PID:3392
xl2tpd[3392]: Written by Mark Spencer, Copyright (C) 1998, Adtran, Inc.
xl2tpd[3392]: Forked by Scott Balmos and David Stipp, (C) 2001
xl2tpd[3392]: Inherited by Jeff McAdams, (C) 2002
xl2tpd[3392]: Forked again by Xelerance (www.xelerance.com) (C) 2006
xl2tpd[3392]: Listening on IP address 192.168.1.60, port 1701
xl2tpd[3392]: control_finish: Peer requested tunnel 3 twice, ignoring
second one.
xl2tpd[3392]: Connection established to 192.168.1.51, 1701. Local: 18788,
Remote: 3 (ref=0/0). LNS session is 'default'
xl2tpd[3392]: Call established with 192.168.1.51, Local: 23233, Remote: 1,
Serial: 0
/usr/sbin/pppd: /usr/lib/./pppd/2.4.5/pppol2tp.so: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
/usr/sbin/pppd: Couldn't load plugin pppol2tp.so
xl2tpd[3392]: child_handler : pppd exited for call 1 with code 2
xl2tpd[3392]: call_close: Call 23233 to 192.168.1.51 disconnected
xl2tpd[3392]: control_finish: Connection closed to 192.168.1.51, port 1701
(), Local: 18788, Remote: 3
xl2tpd[3392]: control_finish: Peer requested tunnel 4 twice, ignoring
second one.
xl2tpd[3392]: Connection established to 192.168.1.51, 1701. Local: 17297,
Remote: 4 (ref=0/0). LNS session is 'default'
xl2tpd[3392]: check_control: Received out of order control packet on tunnel
4 (got 3, expected 2)
xl2tpd[3392]: handle_packet: bad control packet!
xl2tpd[3392]: Call established with 192.168.1.51, Local: 61802, Remote: 1,
Serial: 0
/usr/sbin/pppd: /usr/lib/./pppd/2.4.5/pppol2tp.so: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
/usr/sbin/pppd: Couldn't load plugin pppol2tp.so
xl2tpd[3392]: child_handler : pppd exited for call 1 with code 2
xl2tpd[3392]: call_close: Call 61802 to 192.168.1.51 disconnected
xl2tpd[3392]: control_finish: Connection closed to 192.168.1.51, port 1701
(), Local: 17297, Remote: 4
[root at Hi-ali ~]# tail -f /var/log/secure
Aug 20 19:07:23 Hi-ali runuser: pam_unix(runuser:session): session opened
for user qpidd by (uid=0)
Aug 20 19:07:23 Hi-ali runuser: pam_unix(runuser:session): session closed
for user qpidd
Aug 20 19:07:23 Hi-ali runuser: pam_unix(runuser-l:session): session opened
for user qpidd by (uid=0)
Aug 20 19:07:23 Hi-ali runuser: pam_unix(runuser-l:session): session closed
for user qpidd
Aug 20 19:07:26 Hi-ali polkitd(authority=local): Registered Authentication
Agent for session /org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Session1 (system bus name
:1.23 [/usr/libexec/polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1], object path
/org/gnome/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.UTF-8)
Aug 20 19:09:59 Hi-ali pam: gdm-password[2865]:
pam_unix(gdm-password:session): session opened for user alireza by (uid=0)
Aug 20 19:09:59 Hi-ali polkitd(authority=local): Unregistered
Authentication Agent for session /org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Session1
(system bus name :1.23, object path
/org/gnome/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.UTF-8)
(disconnected from bus)
Aug 20 19:10:03 Hi-ali polkitd(authority=local): Registered Authentication
Agent for session /org/freedesktop/ConsoleKit/Session2 (system bus name
:1.38 [/usr/libexec/polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1], object path
/org/gnome/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.utf8)
Aug 20 19:10:23 Hi-ali su: pam_unix(su-l:session): session opened for user
root by alireza(uid=500)
Aug 20 19:10:43 Hi-ali su: pam_unix(su-l:session): session opened for user
root by alireza(uid=500)
Aug 20 19:10:58 Hi-ali su: pam_unix(su-l:session): session opened for user
root by alireza(uid=500)
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000008]
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: received
Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: received
Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already
using method 109
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION]
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [MS-Negotiation Discovery Capable]
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [Vid-Initial-Contact]
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [IKE CGA version 1]
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 192.168.1.51
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: OAKLEY_GROUP 20 not supported. Attribute
OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: OAKLEY_GROUP 19 not supported. Attribute
OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): no
NAT detected
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '192.168.1.51'
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R2 to state STATE_MAIN_R3
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established
{auth=OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY cipher=aes_256 prf=oakley_sha group=modp2048}
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.51/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #2: responding to Quick Mode proposal {msgid:01000000}
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #2: us: 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #2: them: 192.168.1.51[+S=C]:17/1701
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #2: transition from state STATE_QUICK_R0 to state
STATE_QUICK_R1
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #2: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed,
expecting QI2
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #2: transition from state STATE_QUICK_R1 to state
STATE_QUICK_R2
Aug 20 19:11:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #2: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec SA established tunnel mode
{ESP=>0xed007d37 <0x3e124c0b xfrm=AES_128-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none
DPD=none}
Aug 20 19:11:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: received Delete SA(0xed007d37) payload: deleting IPSEC
State #2
Aug 20 19:11:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: received and ignored informational message
Aug 20 19:11:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51 #1: received Delete SA payload: deleting ISAKMP State #1
Aug 20 19:11:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[1]
192.168.1.51: deleting connection "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin" instance
with peer 192.168.1.51 {isakmp=#0/ipsec=#0}
Aug 20 19:11:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: received
and ignored informational message
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000008]
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: received
Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: received
Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already
using method 109
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION]
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [MS-Negotiation Discovery Capable]
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [Vid-Initial-Contact]
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [IKE CGA version 1]
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 192.168.1.51
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: OAKLEY_GROUP 20 not supported. Attribute
OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: OAKLEY_GROUP 19 not supported. Attribute
OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): no
NAT detected
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '192.168.1.51'
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R2 to state STATE_MAIN_R3
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established
{auth=OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY cipher=aes_256 prf=oakley_sha group=modp2048}
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.51/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #4: responding to Quick Mode proposal {msgid:01000000}
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #4: us: 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #4: them: 192.168.1.51[+S=C]:17/1701
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #4: transition from state STATE_QUICK_R0 to state
STATE_QUICK_R1
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #4: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed,
expecting QI2
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #4: transition from state STATE_QUICK_R1 to state
STATE_QUICK_R2
Aug 20 19:11:22 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #4: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec SA established tunnel mode
{ESP=>0xba685b28 <0x08134c8a xfrm=AES_128-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none
DPD=none}
Aug 20 19:11:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: received Delete SA(0xba685b28) payload: deleting IPSEC
State #4
Aug 20 19:11:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: received and ignored informational message
Aug 20 19:11:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51 #3: received Delete SA payload: deleting ISAKMP State #3
Aug 20 19:11:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[2]
192.168.1.51: deleting connection "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin" instance
with peer 192.168.1.51 {isakmp=#0/ipsec=#0}
Aug 20 19:11:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.51:500: received
and ignored informational message
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.50:500: received
Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.50:500: received
Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, but already
using method 109
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.50:500: received
Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already
using method 109
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.50:500: received
Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.50:500: ignoring
Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION 80000000]
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: packet from 192.168.1.50:500: received
Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 192.168.1.50
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): no
NAT detected
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '192.168.1.50'
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R2 to state STATE_MAIN_R3
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established
{auth=OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY cipher=aes_256 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024}
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: ignoring informational payload, type IPSEC_INITIAL_CONTACT
msgid=00000000
Aug 20 19:14:02 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: received and ignored informational message
Aug 20 19:14:03 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:03 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:03 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:03 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:03 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:06 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:06 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:06 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:06 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:06 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:09 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:09 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:09 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:09 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:09 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:12 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:15 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:18 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:18 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:18 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:18 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:18 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:21 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:21 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:21 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:21 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:21 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:24 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:27 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:27 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:27 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:27 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:27 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:30 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:30 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:30 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:30 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:30 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:34 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:34 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:34 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:34 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:34 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:37 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:37 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:37 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:37 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:37 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:40 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:40 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:40 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:40 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:40 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:43 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:43 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:43 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:43 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:43 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:46 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:46 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:46 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:46 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:46 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:49 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:49 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:49 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:49 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:49 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:52 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:52 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:52 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:52 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:52 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:55 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:55 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:55 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:55 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:55 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:14:58 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:14:58 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:14:58 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:14:58 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:14:58 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
Aug 20 19:15:01 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: the peer proposed: 192.168.1.60/32:17/1701 ->
192.168.1.50/32:17/1701
Aug 20 19:15:01 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: peer proposal was reject in a virtual connection policy
because:
Aug 20 19:15:01 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: a private network virtual IP was required, but the
proposed IP did not match our list (virtual_private=)
Aug 20 19:15:01 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
is known for 192.168.1.60[+S=C]:17/1701...192.168.1.50[+S=C]:17/0
Aug 20 19:15:01 Hi-ali pluto[2323]: "roadwarrior-l2tp-updatedwin"[3]
192.168.1.50 #5: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to
192.168.1.50:500
^C
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120820/247b2285/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kernel-crash.png
Type: image/png
Size: 68809 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120820/247b2285/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Users
mailing list