[Openswan Users] Weird routing issue - at least to me.‏

Tim Larsen tim.larsen at smoothwall.net
Tue Mar 2 10:04:26 EST 2010


Hi

Thanks for the reply.

> Either scenario won't work as 10.0.0.0/8 contains both 10.1.1.0/24
> and 10.1.0.0/24.
>
> You need to have them in separate nets. Do you really need to use a 
> range as large as /8?

No, I can rearrange it and have done so to get it working. I was just
surprised that the routing did not work as I expected when the traffic
flows fine from the branch1 to the main site, crossing the branch0 site.
It's only when accessing branch0 that the packets seem to not follow the
routing table.




-- 
Tim Larsen
Support Manager

SmoothWall Ltd
1 John Charles Way
Leeds LS12 6QA
United Kingdom

1 800 959 3760     (USA, Canada and North America)
0870 1 999 500     (United Kingdom)
+44 870 1 999 500  (All other countries)

SmoothWall is registered in England: 4298247

This email and any attachments transmitted with it are confidential
to the intended recipient(s) and may not be communicated to any
other person or published by any means without the permission of
SmoothWall Limited.  Any opinions stated in this message are solely
those of the author.  See: http://smoothwall.net/company/email.php
for the full text of this notice.


This email has been processed by SmoothZap - www.smoothwall.net



More information about the Users mailing list