[Openswan Users] Kernel vs. Openswan KLIPS Support Matrix
David McCullough
David_Mccullough at securecomputing.com
Tue Feb 17 21:59:26 EST 2009
Jivin hiren joshi lays it down ...
> I have successfully compiled openswan-2.6.20 with new NAT-T code
> (that does not require a kernel recompile)
> against kernel-2.6.23.14-107.fc8.
>
> I am attaching the new NAT-T patch with some minor changes.
Just tried your patch on linux-2.6.26 with openswan-2.6.20. So
far it seems to be working fine for NAT-T :-)
Cheers,
Davidm
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Torsten Krah
> <tkrah at fachschaft.imn.htwk-leipzig.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any resource somewhere to see a kernel compatbility matrix with
> > openswan (2.6 kernel)?
> >
> > The latest kernel version where the nat-t patch works is 2.6.23.x.
> > But openswan 2.6.20 does not compile with that kernel, 2.4.13 does.
> >
> > Really confusing which version are known to work together (although i thought
> > a "newer" version should work with an older kernel version, but thats not the
> > case.
> >
> > Someone can help here a little bit?
> >
> > thx
> >
> > Torsten
> >
> > --
> > Bitte senden Sie mir keine Word- oder PowerPoint-Anhänge.
> > Siehe http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.de.html
> >
> > Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a
> > completely unintentional side effect."
> > -- Linus Torvalds
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users at openswan.org
> > http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
> > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155
> >
> >
--
David McCullough, david_mccullough at securecomputing.com, Ph:+61 734352815
McAfee - SnapGear http://www.snapgear.com http://www.uCdot.org
More information about the Users
mailing list