[Openswan Users] Problem with default route on tunnel

Andy Gay andy at andynet.net
Mon Apr 23 09:31:02 EDT 2007


On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:54 +0200, Harald Scharf wrote:
> Hello, list
> 
>  
> 
> We want to make our vpn mesh network to use an ipsec tunnel
> 
> as default route to the central site, so that any unknown traffic
> (with no explicit vpn destination) uses
> 
> the central firewall policies.
> 
> The connection becomes established, but the problem is, that any
> 
> local routes on the vpn box (witch acts as default gw for the LAN
> clients) are no longer accessible.
> 
>  
> 
> For explanation:
> 
> We have the WAN Interface, the LAN Interface and the DMZ interface.
> 
> If the tunnel is set to “leftsubnet=0/0” or “leftsubnet=128.0.0.0/0”
> 
> then ALL packets are using the tunnel, also these, which should
> 
> be routed locally (to the DMZ).
> 
>  
> 
> Any ideas, what I can do to get this working properly?

Check out these threads on the same subject:
http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2006-August/010409.html
http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2006-August/010463.html
http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2006-August/010472.html


> 
>  
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>  
> 
> Harald
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  NESTEC - Die IT Security & Messaging Distribution mit Personlichkeit
>      GFi Software - BitDefender - NOD32 - BRICKS ISS - pdfMachine
>             2X Terminal & ThinClient Solutions -Accunetix
>                    Besuchen Sie uns: www.nestec.at
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and 
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
> believed to be clean. 
> _______________________________________________
> Users at openswan.org
> http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan: 
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155



More information about the Users mailing list