[Openswan Users] L2TP/IPSEC (again)
Giovani Moda - MR Informática
giovani at mrinformatica.com.br
Fri Nov 18 17:12:51 CET 2005
Hi all,
First of all, openswan-2.4.4 natt and klips patches work perfectly with FC2
(kernel-2.6.10-1.771_FC2).
Now, i'm trying to stabilish that damn tunnel between XP and Openswan, but I
can't seem to find a way to make it work.
I'm noticing that connection seem to be droped prematurel when negotiating
the tunnel.
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: packet from a.b.c.d:500: ignoring Vendor
ID payload [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004]
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: packet from a.b.c.d:500: ignoring Vendor
ID payload [FRAGMENTATION]
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: packet from a.b.c.d:500: received Vendor
ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] method set to=106
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: packet from a.b.c.d: ignoring Vendor ID
payload [Vid-Initial-Contact]
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[1] a.b.c.d #1: responding to
Main Mode from unknown peer 192.168.1.173
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[1] a.b.c.d #1: transition from
state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[1] a.b.c.d #1: STATE_MAIN_R1:
sent MR1, expecting MI2
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[1] a.b.c.d #1: NAT-Traversal:
Result using draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02/03: no NAT detected
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[1] a.b.c.d #1: transition from
state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[1] a.b.c.d #1: STATE_MAIN_R2:
sent MR2, expecting MI3
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[1] a.b.c.d #1: Main mode peer ID
is ID_DER_ASN1_DN: 'C=BR, ST=...'
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #1: deleting
connection "inet-XP" instance with peer a.b.c.d {isakmp=#0/ipsec=#0}
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #1: I am sending my
cert
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #1: transition from
state STATE_MAIN_R2 to state STATE_MAIN_R3
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #1: STATE_MAIN_R3:
sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established {auth=OAKLEY_RSA_SIG
cipher=oakley_3des_cbc_192 prf=oakley_sha group=modp2048}
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #2: responding to
Quick Mode {msgid:618f71f4}
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #2: transition from
state STATE_QUICK_R0 to state STATE_QUICK_R1
Nov 18 16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #2: STATE_QUICK_R1:
sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2
Nov 18 16:59:49 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #2: transition from
state STATE_QUICK_R1 to state STATE_QUICK_R2
Nov 18 16:59:49 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #2: STATE_QUICK_R2:
IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x54187660 <0x982e9c37 xfrm=3DES_0-HMAC_MD5
NATD=192.168.1.173:500 DPD=none}
Nov 18 16:59:54 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #1: received Delete
SA(0x54187660) payload: deleting IPSEC State #2
Nov 18 16:59:54 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #1: received and
ignored informational message
Nov 18 16:59:54 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #1: received Delete
SA payload: deleting ISAKMP State #1
Nov 18 16:59:54 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d: deleting connection
"inet-XP" instance with peer a.b.c.d {isakmp=#0/ipsec=#0}
I don't know if this is a normal behavior or not, but should that "Nov 18
16:59:48 main pluto[9530]: "inet-XP"[2] a.b.c.d #1: deleting connection
"inet-XP" instance with peer a.b.c.d {isakmp=#0/ipsec=#0}" line be there
right after STATE_MAIN_R2? 'Cause I can't see anything going through the
tunnel after the connection is stabilished. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Giovani
More information about the Users
mailing list