[Openswan Users] %hold 0 %acquire-netlink
Michael Jurney
mikej at datasynapse.com
Mon Jul 18 12:09:29 CEST 2005
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Michael Jurney wrote:
>
>> 000 192.168.8.23/32:0 -1-> 192.168.28.1/32:0 => %hold 0
>> %acquire-netlink
>> 000 192.168.8.23/32:0 -1-> 192.168.28.1/32:0 => %hold 0
>> %acquire-netlink
>> 000 192.168.8.23/32:0 -1-> 192.168.28.1/32:0 => %hold 0
>> %acquire-netlink
>> 000 192.168.8.7/32:0 -1-> 192.168.28.1/32:0 => %hold 0
>> %acquire-netlink
>> 000 192.168.8.23/32:0 -1-> 192.168.28.1/32:0 => %hold 0
>> %acquire-netlink
>>
>> And so on. The IPs on the right vary, and are both in remote offices
>> as well as on the internet.
>>
>> the only reference to this that I can find in the archives is of a
>> user saying that including the no_oe config file solved the problem.
>> I'm already including this, though.
>>
>> This is a debian system with a stock 2.6.12.2 kernel:
>>
>> Linux vpn 2.6.12.2 #1 SMP Wed Jul 13 08:19:36 EDT 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
>> Linux Openswan U2.2.0/K2.6.12.2 (native)
>
>
> Please upgrade openswan. Various acquire fixes went into late rversions.
>
> Paul
I've upgraded to openswan 2.3.1:
Linux Openswan U2.3.1/K2.6.11 (netkey)
I'm still seeing identical behavior. Is the 2.6 kernel just a bad idea
(the version number is a little misleading, it's a scratch build with
all of the debian 2.6.11 patches, the extraversion just wasn't set)?
--
Michael D. Jurney
Sysadmin, DataSynapse
mikej at datasynapse.com
p: 212.842.8860
View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
<http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp>
More information about the Users
mailing list