[Openswan Users] packet rejected: should have been encrypted

Bram Bouwens bbouwens at xs4all.nl
Mon Jul 4 18:00:13 CEST 2005


Jacco de Leeuw wrote:
> Bram Bouwens schreef:
> 
>> I'm now trying to work out a setup for our Windows addicts.
>> In the test setup I have a Windows XP machine behind a NAT
>> gateway. I'm following
>> http://www.natecarlson.com/linux/ipsec-x509.php .
> 
> 
> I don't know if this causes your problem but your subnet is not excluded:
> 
>>         
>> virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:192.168.0.0/16
> 
> 
>           
> virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,
>                           %v4:!192.168.0.0/24
> 
> Jacco

After looking up some documentation (it's not in the ipsec.conf
man page but in /usr/share/doc/packages/openswan/README.NAT-Traversal)
I agree with this exclusion. But I do not yet see this being related
to the issue at hand (I might have struck on it later :)


Bram



More information about the Users mailing list