[Openswan Users] Rhel 3 with natt patch?

Paul Wouters paul at xelerance.com
Tue Sep 14 16:51:02 CEST 2004


On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Nicole Hähnel wrote:

> Now I get this line and no errors:
>
> Checking NAT and MASQUERADEing           [N/A]

Good.

> config setup
>    interfaces="ipsec0=eth1"
>    klipsdebug=none
>    plutodebug=none
>    uniqueids=no
>    nat_traversal=yes

You are still missing a virtual_private= line

> conn lan1-lan2
>    leftrsasigkey=%cert
>    leftcert=vpn_cert1.pem
>    leftid="/C=XX...."
>    leftsubnet=172.10.0.0/16
>    right=%any
>    rightid="/C=XX..."
>    rightsubnet=172.10.10.0/24
>    rightrsasigkey=%cert
>    #
>    auto=add

Your networks also overlap, this might cause problems.

>
> conn %default
>    authby=rsasig
>    left="public ip"
>    leftnexthop=xx.xx.xx.xx
>    leftrsasigkey=%cert
>    leftid="/C=XX..."
>    #
>    right=192.168.254.2
>    rightid="/C=XX..."
>    rightcert=vpn_cert2.pem
>
> conn lan1-lan2
>    rightrsasigkey=%cert
>    rightnexthop=%direct

I dont think this is a direct connect? since left is a public ip.

>    leftsubnet=172.10.0.0/16
>    rightsubnet=172.10.10.0/24
>    rightupdown=/etc/ipsec.d/updown

I don't nkow what this does, but I dont think it should be needed.

> Is virtual_private needed or necessary?

Yes. Either that or specify subnetwithin's. I always use
virtual_private myself.

Paul


More information about the Users mailing list