[Openswan Users] klips with nat-t on a 2.4 kernel with the 26sec backport?

[Michael Richardson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Nate" == Nate Carlson <natecars at natecarlson.com> writes:
    Nate> As I understand it, the problem is that Klips supports a
    Nate> couple different kinds of NAT Traversal specifications, and
    Nate> the 26sec kernel patch only supports one. Is that correct?

  Yes, 26sec supports the latest one.

    Nate> If that is indeed the case, how tough would it be to get a patch that
    Nate> would make Pluto only attempt to negotiate the 26sec-supported
    Nate> ESPinUDP method, or prefer that method over the rest of them?
    Nate> I tried looking over 

  This should already be the case.
  I'm not exactly sure what is going on - perhaps pluto gets confused as
to which kind 26sec actually supports.

- --
]     "Elmo went to the wrong fundraiser" - The Simpson         |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBQKqbE4qHRg3pndX9AQEWKwP+IsxPGlo7tOHEAzLmAquoby+KckM+X3K/
qmdMDAxiKn1j2KpZTKk5nWI9DKXp5Rh9Vxz2M1w/OzScPPZgXaTxfhNTB70h4D+L
ETMntJ7XgqbKuk1ryCgtyoQAO+ysebY5A379aI/wq6+Wdtsi7q6v5hDikmrxUyEZ
Tuvv+yi2+zw=
=VZ8O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----