[Openswan Users] Difference between OpenSwan 1.0.1 and 2.1.0
Andreas Steffen
andreas.steffen at strongsec.net
Fri Mar 12 14:27:04 CET 2004
Since openswan-2.1.0 does not support AES yet, you can use for the
time being thepatches found at my site
http://www.strongsec.com/freeswan/
First patch freeswan-2.04 with the X.509 patch 1.5.3 and
then apply the AES patches
freeswan2-alg-0.8.1rc12-BASE-klips.diff.gz (needed for 2.4 kernel only)
freeswan2-alg-0.8.1rc12-BASE-common.diff.gz
freeswan2-alg-0.8.1rc12-enc-aes.diff.gz
from http://www.irrigacion.gov.ar/juanjo/ipsec/testing/fs-2.04/
plus the adapted patch
freeswan2-alg-0.8.1rc12-BASE-pluto_with_x509-1.5.3.diff.gz
from http://www.strongsec.com/freeswan/
This combination is successfully running on the native 2.6.3 kernel.
Regards
Andreas
Alexander Samad wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:11:36AM +0100, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Zhang Jian wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What difference between Openswan 1.0.1 and 2.1.0?
>>
>>Openswan-1 is the continuation of 'super-freeswan'. It is in maintanance mode,
>>meaning no active development happens there.
>>
>>Openswan-2 is th current tree. Openswan-2.0.0 is based on freeswan-2.0x
>>(before they removed AH support)
>>
>>
>>>I know 1.0.1 have X.509, AES, NAT-T, XAUTH, DPD these features, 2.1.0 also
>>>have these features except supporting 2.6?
>
>
> Does AES work with the native stack ?
=======================================================================
Andreas Steffen e-mail: andreas.steffen at strongsec.com
strongSec GmbH home: http://www.strongsec.com
Alter Zürichweg 20 phone: +41 1 730 80 64
CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland) fax: +41 1 730 80 65
==========================================[strong internet security]===
Content Security by MailMarshal
More information about the Users
mailing list