[Openswan Users] multiple disjoint private subnets

Tuomo Soini tis at foobar.fi
Fri Jul 9 02:58:39 CEST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Herbert Xu wrote:

| That's because updown doesn't set the source address or table when
| the route is for 0.0.0.0/0.  I don't see why that should be the case.
| So how about this patch?

Yep. That's known bug. I fixed it for openswan-1 advanced routing patch
for about one month ago when I noticed it. There are other bugs in
_updown.ip2 too like wrong behaviour when *nexthop is not set. Currently
check for nexthop=remote case is missing. I think my patch for that is
still sitting somewhere waiting?

- --
Tuomo Soini <tis at foobar.fi>
Linux and network services
+358 40 5240030
Foobar Oy <http://foobar.fi/>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA7dGeTlrZKzwul1ERAmqiAJ98W8CkJ9+EVyi67ksNj6TJdkABVgCgrVh1
LtKFzmOxQfDzjJtM9Lz1Y9s=
=ageK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Users mailing list