[Openswan Users] Nortel contivity and openswan

[mcr at xelerance.com]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> writes:
    >> 17:32:53 tunnel pluto[4220]: "vpn-sants-nortel" #11:
    >> NAT-Traversal: received 1 NAT-OA. ignored because peer is not
    >> NATed

    Paul> This one I don't understand. Michael? What is a NAT-OA? Why
    Paul> are we ignoring it?

  It is a payload that has a has of ports.
  I think that there is definitely a bug here --- I see it regularly,
but I'm not sure how to reproduce it consistently. (When I see it, I
always have other things to make go...)

  It is on my list.

- -- 
]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBQcrgA4qHRg3pndX9AQEItQQAuXbAdkS3aoLAuhOJwEz6Ndndqc9ltvfD
ArsC9v8zQ8hRWKaU+YxEedQB33agiW9lX7JDxkI0qxWzdSiy8OoeuLbYxYwdJPjx
ASgsz/FjIWwc+fwPWnJbYnvXGXEFLL2w034KjZGEY1DN30j/de3KJXUVMqyXrWTx
AUo2lnjnAeY=
=gltv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----