AW: [Openswan Users] Openswan and Checkpoint AI (R54) with
ken at xelerance.com
Mon Apr 19 15:49:51 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Westerhold, Axel wrote:
> Thanks for the quick answer.
> The problem looks like asymmetrical IPsec routing simply because this is
> not a failover solution but a loadbalancing solution. That's why I can
> define a VPN Gateway on Checkpoint and Cisco with more then one IP
> address. That way I can define gateway = VIP,node1,node2. I was
> wondering if this is possible using freeswan.
Not to my knowledge. Can you give details, like RFCs, IETF drafts, or
published documentation on this method of loadbalancing?
Ken Bantoft VP Business Development
ken at xelerance.com Xelerance Corporation
The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet.
-- William Gibson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Users