AW: [Openswan Users] Openswan and Checkpoint AI (R54) with RainwallCluster Software

[Ken Bantoft]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Westerhold, Axel wrote:

> Thanks for the quick answer.
> 
> The problem looks like asymmetrical IPsec routing simply because this is
> not a failover solution but a loadbalancing solution. That's why I can
> define a VPN Gateway on Checkpoint and Cisco with more then one IP
> address. That way I can define gateway = VIP,node1,node2. I was
> wondering if this is possible using freeswan.

Not to my knowledge.  Can you give details, like RFCs, IETF drafts, or 
published documentation on this method of loadbalancing?



- -- 
Ken Bantoft			VP Business Development
ken at xelerance.com		Xelerance Corporation
sip://toronto.xelerance.com	http://www.xelerance.com

The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet. 
        -- William Gibson

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAg8ryPiOgilmwgkgRAqUiAJ446mF3QvZq7IojuUKx673STPyhNwCgsi5d
IwSSmDdQtMGSDR8wf6gsthI=
=zQJH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----