[Openswan dev] [PATCH] Incorrect automatic route via ipsec0
harald at a-little-linux-box.at
Mon Oct 25 12:49:57 EDT 2010
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:16:18PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> > I am not sure why we ever created the virtual interface with a mask
> > other than /32. Maybe just to avoid confusion. It would make sense to
> > me to just assign it the address, but like Harald I worry that we might
> > create other problems.
> I too have run into this and had some systems where I had to manually delete
> a route. Perhaps one of the Hugh's remembers why this was done?
Hmmm in the meantime we could also try the other way and do some testing - is
there any chance to test the new code on 2.4 kernels?
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at openswan.org
More information about the Dev