[Openswan dev] [PATCH] Incorrect automatic route via ipsec0

[Paul Wouters]

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Bart Trojanowski wrote:

> I am not sure why we ever created the virtual interface with a mask
> other than /32.  Maybe just to avoid confusion.  It would make sense to
> me to just assign it the address, but like Harald I worry that we might
> create other problems.

I too have run into this and had some systems where I had to manually delete
a route. Perhaps one of the Hugh's remembers why this was done?

Paul