[Openswan dev] [PATCH] Incorrect automatic route via ipsec0
paul at xelerance.com
Mon Oct 25 12:16:18 EDT 2010
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> I am not sure why we ever created the virtual interface with a mask
> other than /32. Maybe just to avoid confusion. It would make sense to
> me to just assign it the address, but like Harald I worry that we might
> create other problems.
I too have run into this and had some systems where I had to manually delete
a route. Perhaps one of the Hugh's remembers why this was done?
More information about the Dev