[Openswan dev] openswan 2.1.0rc1 rpms

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de
Wed Mar 3 01:27:24 CET 2004

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:13:11AM +0100, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Note: No kernel patches, so any feature tied to that (NAT-T) is not
> > there. Do you consider it worth while to patch up the FC1 kernel to
> > allow for NAT-T (e.g. the ATrpms patched kernels?), or is it wiser to
> > wait another month for FC2 and 2.6.x?
> FC should have UDP_ENCAPS for nat-t. When openswan-2 adds the userland part,
> it will work without kernel recompiles.

Even FC1? I thought only RHEL3 and FC2 would do that w/o kernel
patching. If so, then the FC1 rpms should already support NAT-T. :)
Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20040303/277c484f/attachment.bin

More information about the Dev mailing list