[Openswan dev] openswan 2.1.0rc1 rpms

Paul Wouters paul at xelerance.com
Wed Mar 3 01:13:11 CET 2004

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Axel Thimm wrote:

> Note: No kernel patches, so any feature tied to that (NAT-T) is not
> there. Do you consider it worth while to patch up the FC1 kernel to
> allow for NAT-T (e.g. the ATrpms patched kernels?), or is it wiser to
> wait another month for FC2 and 2.6.x?

FC should have UDP_ENCAPS for nat-t. When openswan-2 adds the userland part,
it will work without kernel recompiles.


More information about the Dev mailing list