[Openswan dev] Debian package of Openswan
paul at xelerance.com
Wed Mar 3 00:41:11 CET 2004
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Nate Carlson wrote:
> > So yes, when openswan-2 userland has integrated the latest nat-t stuff,
> > all the issues regarding kernel recompiles for NAT-T should be a thing
> > of the past.
> Rock on! :)
> Would it be reasonable to replace the current patch included with the
> NAT-T code for 2.4 with the backported UDP_ENCAPS code then, so that the
> implementation is the same on either kernel version? Or is the just
> unnecessary work?
Yes. I think that was the reason the old 0.6 NAT-T patch wasn't put in to
begin with. We received some patches from SuSe and Herbert Xu.
More information about the Dev