[Openswan dev] Debian package of Openswan

[Nate Carlson]

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Paul Wouters wrote:
> It should. Since the changes are in udp.c, just like the original nat-t
> patch. If you look at the code, it looks so vastly similar, you wonder
> why the first patch was never accepted by the kernel people to begin
> with.
> 
> So yes, when openswan-2 userland has integrated the latest nat-t stuff,
> all the issues regarding kernel recompiles for NAT-T should be a thing
> of the past.

Rock on! :)

Would it be reasonable to replace the current patch included with the
NAT-T code for 2.4 with the backported UDP_ENCAPS code then, so that the
implementation is the same on either kernel version? Or is the just
unnecessary work?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| nate carlson | natecars at natecarlson.com | http://www.natecarlson.com |
|       depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981            |
------------------------------------------------------------------------