[Openswan Users] the packets did not traffic under ESP tunnel on openswan
Ozai
ozai.tien at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 05:16:54 EDT 2012
Dear Sirs,
I do not set any policies SPD on openswan.The following setkey rules are just on the ipsec-tool.You mean we do not need to set any policies on openswan,right?How does openswan pass packets through the tunnel?
Best Regards,
Ozai
----- Original Message -----
From: Panagiotis Tamtamis
To: Ozai
Cc: Paul Wouters ; users at openswan.org
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] the packets did not traffic under ESP tunnel on openswan
openswan configures kernel with policies SPD in order to pass packets through the tunnel.
with spdflush I guess you delete all these rules.
openswan at minimum configures 3 SPD policies. in out fwd
From your rules I miss the fwd rule.
2012/3/19 Ozai <ozai.tien at gmail.com>
Dear Paul,
In ipsec-tool,we use the setkey to manipulate the Security Policy Database(SPD) as IPSec policy.so kernel can unserstand which packets need to traffic under ESP tunnel,which packets do not need.the following is the setkey configuration.
Do we have any policy control like ipsec-tool on openswan?
# cat setkey.conf
flush;
spdflush;
spdadd 192.168.1.254/24 192.168.1.254/24 any -P out none;
spdadd 192.168.1.254/24 192.168.1.254/24 any -P in none;
spdadd 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/220.229.43.164-111.83.84.59/require;
spdadd 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.0/24 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/111.83.84.59-220.229.43.164/require;
Best Regards,
Ozai
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Wouters" <paul at nohats.ca>
To: "Ozai" <ozai.tien at gmail.com>
Cc: <users at openswan.org>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] the packets did not traffic under ESP tunnel on openswan
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Ozai wrote:
It still did not work after adding your suggestions.
B can ping to A but A can not ping to B even from device itself.
I captured the packets by wireshark and found the packets from A client always did not traffic under ESP tunnel.Do you have any suggestion for us
do the clients have the ipsec gateway as default router? If not, they
might need to get a route for the remote subnet via the ipsec gateway.
Paul
A client---------------openswan gateway------------------------------ipsec-tool gateway---------------------B client
192.168.1.2 192.168.1.1 111.243.152.132 111.243.156.217 192.168.2.254 192.168.2.1
Best Regards,
Ozai
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Wouters" <paul at nohats.ca>
To: "Ozai" <ozai.tien at gmail.com>
Cc: <users at openswan.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] the packets did not traffic under ESP tunnel on openswan
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Ozai wrote:
I merged the openswan(2.6.37) into embedded linux(mips) and tried to make the connection with another ipsec
system(ipsec-tools).The ESP tunnel can be built successfully.I tried to ping private client from ipsec-tools to
openswan.It's OK.but from openswan to ipsec-tools,It's failed.I found that from openswan to ipsec-tools,the packets did
not traffic under ESP tunnel.My settings are as below.Please help me to correct my procedure.thank's.
Did you test from the device itself? Did you ping -I ?
Try adding:
leftsourceip=111.243.152.132
rightsourceip=111.243.156.217
Ensure you are not NATing packes for/to the 192.168 ranges.
Ensure you have forwarding enabled, and rp_filter disabled
(if your embedded system has perl, try "ipsec verify"
Paul
_______________________________________________
Users at lists.openswan.org
https://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Micropayments: https://flattr.com/thing/38387/IPsec-for-Linux-made-easy
Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155
--
Think simple!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120319/43dbe6e2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list