[Openswan Users] OpenSwan and iPhone
Helmut Manck
helmut.manck at eonas.de
Wed Nov 25 04:14:27 EST 2009
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Helmut Manck wrote:
>
>
>> when trying to establish an IPsec tunnel between a roadwarrior iphone OS
>> 3.1 and an openswan server running 2.6.21 I get some trouble regarding
>> modecfg settings.
>>
>
> Why not use L2TP? People are using that on their iphones to Openswan without
> problems.
>
The L2TP-support of the iPhone cannot use certificates to authenticate
the server side (just preshared key). Thus it is basically vulnerable to
man-in-the-middle attacks. The IPsec client _can_ use certificates to
authenticate. IPsec is better ;-)
>
>> Nov 24 19:35:30 server011 pluto[894]: "vpngateway-intranet"[2]
>> <iphone-ip> #1: the peer proposed: 0.0.0.0/0:0/0 -> <iphone-ip>/32:0/0
>> Nov 24 19:35:30 server011 pluto[894]: "vpngateway-intranet"[2]
>> <iphone-ip> #1: cannot respond to IPsec SA request because no connection
>> is known for 0.0.0.0/0===<openswan box ip> [C=DE, ST=Berlin, L=Berlin,
>> O=eonas, OU=VPN Endpoint,
>>
>
> The peer claims to want 0.0.0.0/0 ? Beter not give it to them.
>
Sure.
>
>> When setting the leftsubnet (aka the openswan side) from
>> "leftsubnet=10.2.0.0/24" to "leftsubnet=0.0.0.0/0" the tunnel is
>> established but is not usable ( The openswan box is not reachable
>> anymore, with or without the tunnel ).
>>
>
> Yes because it now "lives" at the iphone.
>
>
>> STATE_MODE_CFG_R1, and we aren't xauth client
>>
>
> You would need to use the xauthclient= and xauthserver= options. See man ipsec.conf.
>
Setting
leftxauthserver=yes
rightxauthclient=yes
doesn't change behaviour:
Nov 25 09:49:03 server011 pluto[6470]: "vpngateway-intranet"[2]
<iphone-ip> #1: received MODECFG message when in state
STATE_MODE_CFG_R1, and we aren't xauth client
Actually, it cannot change anything because receiving a modecfg message
is ok in this condition and openswan is not supposed to be xauth client.
When just having a look at the source:
programs/pluto/ikev1.c:
else {
/* XXX check if we are being a mode config server here */
openswan_log("received MODECFG message when in state %s, and we
aren't xauth client"
, enum_name(&state_names, st->st_state));
return;
}
I suppose openswan should reject the inbound MODECFG message and create
an own proposal?
Helmut
> Paul
>
--
Dipl. Ing. Helmut Manck
Senior Consultant
eonas IT-Beratung und Entwicklung GmbH
Gleimstr. 29
10437 Berlin
Germany
helmut.manck at eonas.de
Mobil +49-173 602 7102
Fax +49-30-692 010 089
Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 80613
Geschäftsführer: Helmut Manck
More information about the Users
mailing list