[Openswan Users] Major problems with multiple tunnels on Fedora 11

[Paul Wouters]

On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Marek Greško wrote:

>> I was doing bad consequences. The problem did not arise on upgrade to
>> openswan 2.6.21 I only did not check whether it works with 2.6.19 without
>> NAT. But I am almost sure it did with openswan 2.4. The current state is
>> that it works when using NAT, but not working without NAT. I have set up:
>>
>>         leftsubnet=vhost:%no,%priv
>>
>> The virtual_private is configured properly. What leftsubnet should I use if
>> I want the tunnel to work for the same device whether it is natted or not?
>>
>> Or is it necessary to create separate tunnel definition for non-natted
>> client?
>
> I probably found an answer to my question:
>
> https://gsoc.xelerance.com/issues/973
>
> Isn't it the issue I am observing?

Could be, yes.

Paul