[Openswan Users] Kernel vs. Openswan KLIPS Support Matrix

[Torsten Krah]

Am Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2009 06:25:35 schrieb hiren joshi:
> That hard-coding is removed in openswan-2.6.20.

Hm really?
Looking at the patch you did attached to your post above 
(PATCH_PLUTO_CODE.diff):

...
+       if (nat_traversal_type == NAT_NEW_STYLE) {
+               loglog(RC_LOG_SERIOUS,
+                       "NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T");
+               struct ifreq ifr;
+               struct nattraversalconf *ntc=(struct nattraversalconf 
*)&ifr.ifr_data;
+               memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(ifr));
+               strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, "ipsec0");

....

The interface name is still hardcoded to "ipsec0" - i thought its removed.
I remember some posting of Paul i've read at the archives, that this is a 
still a open point at the nat-t patch.
So i wonder if its removed or not - don't seem so to me, can anybody bring 
some light into this question?


-- 
Bitte senden Sie mir keine Word- oder PowerPoint-Anhänge.
Siehe http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.de.html

Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a 
completely unintentional side effect."
	-- Linus Torvalds
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1996 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090218/f87bdfb9/attachment-0001.bin