[Openswan Users] Openswan 2.6.18 on a Linux 2.6 kernel

Chris The One and Only chrisgchrisg at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 14 09:47:04 EDT 2008

Yes Paul,
Thanks all of you for support.
It works ok with %none and I will test klips as well.
Good luck you all!


----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com>
To: Michael H. Warfield <mhw at WittsEnd.com>
Cc: Chris The One and Only <chrisgchrisg at yahoo.com>; users at lists.openswan.org
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:28:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] Openswan 2.6.18 on a Linux 2.6 kernel

On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Michael H. Warfield wrote:

> > I tried configuring a ipsec tunnel, specifying the output interface
> > like the examples I found on the internet:
> >        interfaces="ipsec0=eth0:1"

Yes, you cannot put alias interfaces there, only real interfaces.

> > I tried with eth0 only (without the subinterface :10), even with eth1,
> > but still the same result.

That should work if using klips. If using netkey, you can set it to
%defaultroute or %none.

If that does not work, please show us an 'ipsec barf' output, with at
the top a one line explanation of your problem again.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20081014/cc2e4465/attachment.html 

More information about the Users mailing list