[Openswan Users] Road Warrior behind NAT - Aggressive Mode: wrong NAT-T decision

[hiren joshi]

Filed a bug report: http://bugs.xelerance.com/view.php?id=972

Thanks for all your answers on this.

-hiren

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, hiren joshi wrote:
>
>  Is it the same for 2.4.12 also?
>> I tested this on openswan-2.4.12.
>>
>
> No, DPD on openswan 2.4.12 or 2.4.13 should work fine.
>
> Paul
>
>
>  On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com> wrote:
>>      On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, hiren joshi wrote:
>>
>>            openswan detects NAT-Traversal as "both are
>>            NATed" instead of "peer is
>>            NATed".
>>
>>            Later on I receive,
>>            DPD: Serious: could not find newest phase 1 state
>>            DPD: Warning: received old or duplicate R_U_THERE
>>
>>            After some time client breaks the connection due
>>            of not getting
>>            DPD_R_U_THERE_ACK
>>
>>
>> DPD is broken on the 2.6.x series. We're looking into it.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080722/2787ad19/attachment.html