[Openswan Users] Road Warrior behind NAT - Aggressive Mode: wrong NAT-T decision

[Paul Wouters]

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, hiren joshi wrote:

> openswan detects NAT-Traversal as "both are NATed" instead of "peer is
> NATed".
> 
> Later on I receive,
> DPD: Serious: could not find newest phase 1 state
> DPD: Warning: received old or duplicate R_U_THERE
> 
> After some time client breaks the connection due of not getting
> DPD_R_U_THERE_ACK

DPD is broken on the 2.6.x series. We're looking into it.

Paul