[Openswan Users] Whack related issues

[Paul Wouters]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Rupam Sarma wrote:

> Thank you for let me know the fact.
>
> It's really unfortunate that nobody has anything to say on this topic.

I think Xelerance is doing a rather large dose of free support to
everyone. Just because your bug doesn't get addressed, does not mean
we're all asleep at the wheel.

AH is hardly used by anyone. Those who do use it, tend to have to use
it for corporate reasons (and tend to mail from yahoo and gmail accounts
to hide those facts). If you want to expediate your bug, you can
obtain commercial support.

Meanwhile, we rather spend our time making things work with the latest
kernels, and other higher priority (unpaid and paid for) items.

With Regards,

Paul

>
> with regards;
> - rupam
>
>
>
> On 8/13/07, Frank Schmirler <osusers at schmirler.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:34:36 -0700, Rupam Sarma wrote
> > > I have some doubts about whack implementation.
> > >
> > > After experimenting many cases, I notice followings
> > >
> > > 1. There is no way to choose AH algorithm by whack command.
> > > 2. If ESP algorithm is defined in whack command; then pluto does not
> > negotiate/establish IPSec AH SA.
> > >
> > > Could anyone of you please explain me the reason(s) behind this type of
> > implementation?
> > >
> > > Any input on this issue is appreciated.
> >
> > I also noticed this. Posted it on the dev mailing list in May (see
> > http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/dev/2007-May/001560.html) but
> > unfortunately didn't get any feedback.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Frank
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users at openswan.org
> > http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
> > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155
> >
>

-- 
Building and integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155