[Openswan Users] 2.4.4 mangles SPI?
Christian Brechbühler
brechbuehler at gmail.com
Tue Nov 28 18:04:44 EST 2006
Openswan 2.4.4 sets up a VPN tunnel to a Cisco router OK:
004 "NYC" #58: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, IPsec SA established
{ESP=>0x91af5acc <0xdd787655 xfrm=3DES_0-HMAC_SHA1 NATD=none DPD=none}
Packets sent from the Cisco side work fine.
But when sending a packet from Openswan through the tunnel, a slightly
different SPI is used (tcpdump):
16:34:12.535324 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: ESP
(50), length: 136) 66.99.99.99 > 38.111.111.111:
ESP(spi=0x91af4878,seq=0x1254001a), length 116
16:34:12.563423 IP (tos 0x20, ttl 240, id 22448, offset 0, flags [none],
proto: UDP (17), length: 104) 38.111.111.111.500 > 66.99.99.99.500: isakmp
1.0 msgid : phase 2/others ? inf[E]: [encrypted hash]
In the first message, note the spi=0x91af4878 instead of 0x91af5acc -- the
last four digits (some of the lower 16 bits) are changed. Sometimes the
discrepancy is in the high 16 bits.
The second message is the "Delete SA" message that the Cisco sends back.
Openswan doesn't know about that SPI either:
Nov 28 16:34:04 [pluto] "NYC" #57: ignoring Delete SA payload:
PROTO_IPSEC_ESP SA(0x91af4978) not found (maybe expired)
What could be causing this?
(Yes, this is still the same problem, but SNAT is out of the way.)
Thanks,
/Christian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20061128/5d8449a5/attachment.html
More information about the Users
mailing list