[Openswan Users] Multiple tunnels

[Norman Rasmussen]

I'm unsure, but don't you have to define two rules from gwA to gwB
(one for networkB, and the other for networkC).  Same for gwB to gwC
(one for networkB, one for networA)

On 5/3/06, Bgs <bgs at bgs.hu> wrote:
>
>   Hi all,
>
>
> I was wondering, which is the best way to achieve complete transparency
> between all networks in the following setup:
>
>
> netA - gwA - Internet - gwB - internet - gwC - netC
>                           \- netB
>
> (For those with non fixed width chars: Three networks are given: netA,
> netB, netC. They all have their VPN capable gateways (gwA, gwB, gwC
> respectively). I want to connect netA with netB and netB with netC, but
> I also want netA to be able to reach netC through A-B + B-C tunnels,
> without A-C tunnels.)
>
> Bye
> Bgs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users at openswan.org
> http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155
>


-- 
- Norman Rasmussen
 - Email: norman at rasmussen.co.za
 - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/