[Openswan Users]

Brian Candler B.Candler at pobox.com
Wed May 10 16:25:01 CEST 2006

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Wasn't that Checkpoint?

Could be. I just remember the implication it was Cisco's from the advisory.
Hmm, here it is:

"Cisco's solution extends the Hybrid Auth model by additionally requiring a
group pre-shared key for VPN group identification. ..."

I think I misread that as "hybrid auth is Cisco's", rather than "Cisco has
taken someone else's hybrid auth and has tweaked it in the following way"



More information about the Users mailing list