[Openswan Users]

[Brian Candler]

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Wasn't that Checkpoint?

Could be. I just remember the implication it was Cisco's from the advisory.
Hmm, here it is:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sn-20040415-grppass.shtml

"Cisco's solution extends the Hybrid Auth model by additionally requiring a
group pre-shared key for VPN group identification. ..."

I think I misread that as "hybrid auth is Cisco's", rather than "Cisco has
taken someone else's hybrid auth and has tweaked it in the following way"

Regards,

Brian.