[Openswan Users] PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to lsipsectool
Paul Wouters
paul at xelerance.com
Wed Jun 21 16:48:55 CEST 2006
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Mihajlo Cvetanovi wrote:
> The diagnostics would have been better if Openswan understood the
> non-encrypted payload in packet as "non-encrypted" instead of "malformed".
It work would even better, if Windows correctly handled phase 1, so there
would never be a case where one end expects encryption while the other
doesn't, or visa versa.
Paul
--
Building and integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155
More information about the Users
mailing list