[Openswan Users]

[Stefan Denker]

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 05:15:24PM +0200, Rodrigo Weymar Fonseca wrote:
> Quoting Paul Wouters <paul at xelerance.com>:
>> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Rodrigo Weymar Fonseca wrote:
>>> suse10:/usr/src/linux # patch -p1 -s < nat-t-patch-2.6.diff
>>> The next patch would create the file include/net/xfrmudp.h,
>>> which already exists!  Assume -R? [n] y
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Well, -R reverses this patch, thereby deleting xfrmudp.h

> despite the error with the NAT-T patch, I applied the KLIPS patch successfully:
> and afterwards I did:
> make oldconfig
> make clean
> make bzImage modules modules_install
> and got the following errors: 
> net/ipsec/ipsec_init.c:95:25: error: net/xfrmudp.h: No such file or directory

So this does hardly suprise me. 

> Clearly the error comes from the broken NAT-T patch. If the suse
> kernel already contains the nat-t patch, would it not compile ok even
> if the patch was not successfully applied ?

You may have ruined your kernel source when trying to patch. I'd suggest
you start over with fresh kernel sources.

Stefan
-- 
Ertraeglich ist der Mensch als Einzelner.
Im Haufen steht er der Tierwelt zu nah.
                                                             [Franz Grillparzer]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060711/121afcca/attachment.bin