[Openswan Users] RE : Openswan 2.4.7 and juniper ns208

[GODARD Jean-Charles]

Hello,

According to the logs phase 1 and phase 2 are established.

Is 194.250.x.x the address of the Juniper or a host address behind the Juniper ?

If it is the Juniper address it is normal that you see packets in clear but if it is a host address defined in your "lt85_to_centre" connection configuration, you may have to check the "leftsubnet=" line.

As you use netkey, as far as I remember, doing a "tcpdump host xxx" will show you only decrypted packets incoming/coming back to your gateway, for example you will see only replies to ping initiated from your openswan gateway... It is a netkey behavior :s

Anyway... What is the original question ? :)

Cheers,

JC


Didine <didinux at gmail.com> a écrit : Hello,
I'm a new user of openswan.
I try to set up a connexion between openswan (Linux Openswan U2.4.7/K2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 (netkey)) and a Juniper ns208.
When i try to setup the link i have the folowing messages. 
 
=====================================================================
[root at lt85 ~]# ipsec auto --verbose --up lt85_to_centre
002 "lt85_to_centre" #11: initiating Main Mode
104 "lt85_to_centre" #11: STATE_MAIN_I1: initiate 
003 "lt85_to_centre" #11: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [166f932d55eb64d8e4df4fd37e2313f0d0fd84510000000000000000]
003 "lt85_to_centre" #11: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] method set to=106 
003 "lt85_to_centre" #11: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
003 "lt85_to_centre" #11: ignoring Vendor ID payload [HeartBeat Notify 386b0100]
002 "lt85_to_centre" #11: enabling possible NAT-traversal with method draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02/03 
002 "lt85_to_centre" #11: discarding packet received during asynchronous work (DNS or crypto) in STATE_MAIN_I1
002 "lt85_to_centre" #11: transition from state STATE_MAIN_I1 to state STATE_MAIN_I2 
106 "lt85_to_centre" #11: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, expecting MR2
003 "lt85_to_centre" #11: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_MAIN_I2
002 "lt85_to_centre" #11: I did not send a certificate because I do not have one. 
003 "lt85_to_centre" #11: NAT-Traversal: Result using draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02/03: no NAT detected
002 "lt85_to_centre" #11: transition from state STATE_MAIN_I2 to state STATE_MAIN_I3
108 "lt85_to_centre" #11: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expecting MR3 
003 "lt85_to_centre" #11: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_MAIN_I3
002 "lt85_to_centre" #11: Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '194.250.x.x'
002 "lt85_to_centre" #11: transition from state STATE_MAIN_I3 to state STATE_MAIN_I4 
004 "lt85_to_centre" #11: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP SA established {auth=OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY cipher=oakley_3des_cbc_192 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024}
002 "lt85_to_centre" #12: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS+UP {using isakmp#11} 
117 "lt85_to_centre" #12: STATE_QUICK_I1: initiate
002 "lt85_to_centre" #12: transition from state STATE_QUICK_I1 to state STATE_QUICK_I2
004 "lt85_to_centre" #12: STATE_QUICK_I2: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x7593622b <0x6859dbc5 xfrm=AES_128-HMAC_SHA1 NATD=none DPD=none} 
=====================================================================
IPsec SA established ?!

A made a test by sending a ping to the  194.250.x.x.
A tcpdump shows the following (no ESP msg):

===================================================================== 
[root at lt85 ~]# tcpdump host 194.250.x.x
19:48:37.441373 IP lt85.xxx.xxx > 194.250.x.x : ICMP echo request, id 1024, seq 55960, length 24
=====================================================================
 
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks a lot.

-- 
Didine _______________________________________________
Users at openswan.org
http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan: 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155


 		
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20061207/4e95dc84/attachment.html