[Openswan Users]
Gbenga
stjames08 at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Apr 25 10:46:49 CEST 2006
Thanks Paul,
All I am trying to achieve is a vpn connection to that 10.10.0.0/16 network, the vpn server obviously from my config is part of the subnet. I have an Internet firewall (iptables) FW to this network and from there I can nat ip addresses from the Internet. On this firewall, I have natted port 500 & 4500 udp only to the vpn server, since it is only passing on those ports to the vpn server.
The firewall on the vpn server has been completely disabled until this works.
What is the workable setup for this? I cannot run the vpn on the firewall, it has to be inside network.
I have changed the parameters you mentioned, actually commented them out and restarted ipsec.
>From the lsipsectool debug page:
09:31:30: Starting Tunnel
09:31:31: IKE Encryption: 3des
IKE Integrity: sha1
Remote Gateway Address: 193.95.xxx.xxx
Remote Monitor Address: 10.10.1.57
Remote Network: 10.10.1.57/255.255.0.0
Local Address: 194.165.176.169
Local Network: 194.165.176.169/255.255.255.255
09:31:31: WinSock Version High : 514 Version : 2
09:31:31: Init checkconnThread::Entry()
09:31:34: Comparing 193.95.xxx.xxx = 193.95.xxx.xxx
09:31:36: 0 ECHO REQUEST TO 10.10.1.57 [ FAILED #0 ] [ Unknow Error Code 11010 ]
09:31:36: Comparing 193.95.xxx.xxx = 193.95.xxx.xxx
09:31:36: 1 ECHO REQUEST TO 10.10.1.57 [ OK ]
09:31:36: Comparing 193.95.xxx.xxx = 193.95.xxx.xxx
09:31:39: 2 ECHO REQUEST TO 10.10.1.57 [ FAILED #0 ] [ Unknow Error Code 11010 ]
09:31:39: Comparing 193.95.xxx.xxx = 193.95.xxx.xxx
09:31:41: 3 ECHO REQUEST TO 10.10.1.57 [ FAILED #1 ] [ Unknow Error Code 11010 ]
09:31:41: Comparing 193.95.xxx.xxx = 193.95.xxx.xxx
09:31:44: 4 ECHO REQUEST TO 10.10.1.57 [ FAILED #2 ] [ Unknow Error Code 11010 ]
09:31:44: Comparing 193.95.xxx.xxx = 193.95.xxx.xxx
09:31:46: 5 ECHO REQUEST TO 10.10.1.57 [ FAILED #3 ] [ Unknow Error Code 11010 ]
09:31:46: Comparing 193.95.xxx.xxx = 193.95.xxx.xxx
09:31:46: 6 ECHO REQUEST TO 10.10.1.57 [ OK ]
new ipsec.conf:
# Specify the version of Openswan we are running
version 2
# Global configuration section:
config setup
interfaces="ipsec0=eth1"
nat_traversal=yes
# klipsdebug="all"
# plutodebug="all"
# General connection section:
conn %default
authby=secret
#authby=secret|rsasig
# Systems Engineering vpn connection definition:
conn syseng
left=10.10.1.57
leftnexthop=193.95.xxx.xxx
leftsourceip=10.10.1.57
type=tunnel
right=%any
rightid=@gbenga
rekey=no
auto=add
conn block
auto=ignore
conn private
auto=ignore
conn private-or-clear
auto=ignore
conn clear
auto=ignore
conn packetdefault
auto=ignore
include /etc/ipsec.d/examples/no_oe.conf
# virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:!10.10.0.0/16
# leftsubnet=10.10.0.0/16
Shuold this be ok?
</var/log/message:>
Apr 25 10:42:07 aparo pluto[5418]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts'
Apr 25 10:42:07 aparo pluto[5418]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts'
Apr 25 10:42:07 aparo pluto[5418]: Changing to directory '/etc/ipsec.d/crls'
Apr 25 10:42:07 aparo pluto[5418]: Warning: empty directory
Apr 25 10:42:08 aparo pluto[5418]: added connection description "syseng"
Apr 25 10:42:08 aparo pluto[5418]: listening for IKE messages
Apr 25 10:42:08 aparo pluto[5418]: adding interface ipsec0/eth1 10.10.1.57:500
Apr 25 10:42:08 aparo pluto[5418]: adding interface ipsec0/eth1 10.10.1.57:4500
Apr 25 10:42:08 aparo pluto[5418]: loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
Apr 25 10:42:19 aparo pluto[5418]: attempt to redefine connection "syseng"
thanks again.
Gbenga
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Gbenga wrote:
> I have been working more on my vpn issue and I am able to establish connection now (atleast from the colour and info from lsipsectool). However, I cannot ping nor pass any kind of traffic on the tunnel.
>
> I did ipsec eroute and nothing show up.
That's odd. Though it could be it establishes and then gets deleted again.
Can you check the openswan logs to see what happened? (Don't add plutodebug=
or klipsdebug= statements!)
> On the lsipsectool configuration page, I had to have the Private Address/Network Mask as the same Remote Internal IP otherwise, I could not establish connection. I wonder why?? I thought that should be the internal network address.
More information about the Users
mailing list