[Openswan Users] ipsec & multicast over gre

Michael Jurney mikej at datasynapse.com
Tue Oct 4 17:16:17 CEST 2005


Michael Jurney wrote:

> Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>>
>> Yup. Ken did a talk about enterprise VPN's at Linux Kongress in 2003:
>>
>>     http://www.xelerance.com/talks/lk2003/
>
>
>
> Thank you for the pointer.  There's one thing I'm not sure of, 
> though:  Am I setting up a tunnel between the inside and outside 
> interfaces of each gateway, between the inside interfaces of both 
> gateways, or between the outside interfaces of both gateways?
>
> Given:
>                        openswan1
>                   ----------------------
> {172.16.32.0/24}--| (eth1) 172.16.32.1 |                 

>                   | 10.1.1.100 (eth0)  |--+
>                   ----------------------  |
>                                           |
>                                           {untrusted network}
>                        openswan2          |
>                  ---------------------    |
>                  | 10.2.2.100 (eth0) |----+
> {172.16.8.0/24}--| (eth1) 172.16.8.1 |
>                  ---------------------
>
> I want broadcast traffic from 172.16.32.0/24 entering eth1 on 
> openswan1 to emit from eth1 on openswan2 onto the segment for 
> 172.16.8.0/24 (and vice-versa).


With off-list assistance, I've worked out the proper ipsec/gre 
configuration, and I'm now moving traffic through GRE-then-Ipsec between 
the 172.16.32.0/24 and 172.16.8.0/24 networks.  Broadcast packets 
originating on one, however, are not being retransmitted.  I'm back to 
wondering whether iptables DNAT is what's required for this to work.  
Should I take broadcast packets arriving in the PREROUTING chain from 
eth1 and DNAT them to the broadcast address of the other network?

-- 
Michael D. Jurney
Sysadmin, DataSynapse
mikej at datasynapse.com
p: 212.842.8860

View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
<http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp>



More information about the Users mailing list