[Openswan Users] FreeSwan + Openswan

[Paul Wouters]

On Mon, 16 May 2005, Giovani Moda - MR Informática wrote:

> All of then? What about RHEL?

All of them have issues, but like I said, if you can work around some mtu
issues and disable compression, you might get it working.

RHEL3 has an outdated backport of the 2.6 NETKEY code. Thanks to Herbert
CVS HEAD should now work on it despite the compression problems, but there
might be more problems, since the NETKEY fixes of 2.6.11+ did not go into
the backport kernel. I do not know the status of the RHEL4 kernels.

Paul

> Giovani
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Wouters" <paul at xelerance.com>
> To: "Giovani Moda - MR Informática" <giovani at mrinformatica.com.br>
> Cc: <users at openswan.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] FreeSwan + Openswan
>
>
>> On Mon, 16 May 2005, Giovani Moda - MR Informática wrote:
>> 
>>> I've been presented to a bit of a problem today: I have an FC2 system and 
>>> I
>>> need to VPN it with an Red Hat 7.2 running FreeSwan 1.99. Does the lastest
>>> Openswan package (2.3.1) running on an FC2 system (kernel 2.6.10-1.12_FC2)
>>> interopts with FreeSwan 1.99 on an 2.4 Kernel? Has anyone done it?
>> 
>> All the fedora core kernels are broken. You could be lucky. At least make
>> sure to have compress=no on both sides of the connection. You might need to
>> play with the mtu to et things working properly.
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>
>
>
>