[Openswan Users] routing problem with netmask 255.255.255.255
Alex, Wheeler
alexdw1 at hotmail.com
Sun Sep 5 14:55:32 CEST 2004
Problem: ipsec0 routes do not appear in IP routing table
I have the following ipconfiguration:
Machine A
ifconfig eth0 w.x.y.z broadcast w.x.y.z netmask 255.255.255.255
route add 10.255.255.1 dev eth0
route add default gw 10.255.255.1
(ipsec config at bottom)
When ipsec is started, a encrypted connection is established. All traffic
from machineB to macineA is encrypted. Traffic from machineA to machineB is
not encrypted.
When looking at the route table, it shows that no ipsec routes have been
added.
It looks as though openswan tries to determine the gateway, checks eth0,
see's that there is only 1 host on the network (itself) and gives up. But
infact 10.255.255.1 is on the same physical network segment, which is the
router for machineA, but openswan ignores this.
Has anybody had this problem? What is the fix/workaround?
Thanks
Alex
alexdw1 at hotmail.com
and the following ipsec.conf of machineA:
version 2.0 # conforms to second version of ipsec.conf specification
config setup
interfaces="ipsec0=eth0"
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none
myid=@machineA
conn %default
auto=start
type=tunnel
left=w.x.y.z
leftrsasigkey=soijcsoidcjsoicjsoicjdoijcosicjosidcjoisdcjpaoskxpaoxkfoobar
conn machineA-to-machineB
auto=start
left=w.x.y.z
rightid=@machineB
right=a.b.c.d
rightrsasigkey=posidcpsodicpsodicpsocipsodicposdicfoobar
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo
More information about the Users
mailing list