[Openswan Users] no connection is known for...

Mark Frost mfrost at westnet.com
Tue May 25 22:44:58 CEST 2004


So is there anything else I might be able to try at this point?

Thanks

Mark

Mark Frost wrote:

> The OpenSwan gateway is really a router in that it sits on the 
> internal and external networks.  There's another box, a Nexlan box, 
> that does NAT for the users on the internal network (172.16.*.*).  The 
> OpenSwan gateway does not translate packets for users nor are any 
> packets from users on the internal network routed there.  (I made a 
> crude picture of this in an earlier post).
>
> Yes, the rightsubnet=192.168.1.0/24 line was uncommented and once 
> again, I got the line saying "no connection is known for..." despite 
> the fact the the certificate DN's and allowable IP's seem to match the 
> output of ipsec auto --status.
>
> Mark
>
> Jacco de Leeuw wrote:
>
>> Mark Frost wrote:
>>
>>> And in my case, I've got NAT on both sides with the OS gateway 
>>> acting as a gateway (but not the NAT server) on the non-roadwarrior 
>>> side.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there really NAT on the Openswan server? Well, there is, you probably
>> do NAT for clients on the internal network accessing the Internet, but
>> IPsec packets coming in from roadwarriors are not NAT-ed on the Openswan
>> server, are they? So the IP address on your internal interface eth1 is
>> something like 172.16.0.48 ?
>>
>>> IPsec passthrough was enabled.  I just turned it off and tried 
>>> again.  It doesn't seem to have any effect.
>>
>>
>>
>> Damn, I was hoping that this was it. The rightsubnet line was 
>> uncommented,
>> right?
>>
>> Jacco
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.openswan.org
> http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users



More information about the Users mailing list