[Openswan Users] Problem applying the NAT-T patch

Davis Goodman davis.goodman at algolith.com
Tue May 25 20:33:49 CEST 2004


Yes it is. Paul mentionned that it should be included and the openswan
source seems to compile fine. I just need to recompile to include the XFRM
module.

Thanks,

Davis 


____________________________________
Davis Goodman
Product Manager / Chef de produit

  

3499 Douglas-B.-Floréani
Montréal (Québec)
Canada H4S 2C6

Tel. : 514.335.9867
Direct: 514-333-0202 #3279
Cell. : 514.994.7360
Fax : 514.333.9873
davis.goodman at algolith.com
www.algolith.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Bantoft [mailto:ken at xelerance.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 7:33 PM
To: Davis Goodman
Cc: users at lists.openswan.org
Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] Problem applying the NAT-T patch



Is this a RHEL kernel?  If so, it may already have parts of a NAT-T patch
included.


On Tue, 25 May 2004, Davis Goodman wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>   I'm trying to apply the nat traversal patch on a linux-2.4.21-15.EL
> kernel and I'm getting this error:
> 
> make nattpatch | (cd /usr/src/linux-2.4 && patch -p1 && make bzImage)
> patching file include/net/sock.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 291 (offset 46 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 612 with fuzz 1 (offset 22 lines).
> patching file net/Config.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 119 (offset 31 lines).
> patching file net/ipv4/udp.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 973 with fuzz 2 (offset 186 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 956 (offset 149 lines).
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 1213.
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file net/ipv4/udp.c.rej


-- 
Ken Bantoft			VP Business Development
ken at xelerance.com		Xelerance Corporation
sip://toronto.xelerance.com	http://www.xelerance.com

The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet. 
        -- William Gibson





More information about the Users mailing list