[Openswan Users] Difference between OpenSwan 1.0.1 and 2.1.0

[Alexander Samad]

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:11:36AM +0100, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Zhang Jian wrote:
> 
> > What difference between Openswan 1.0.1 and 2.1.0?
> 
> Openswan-1 is the continuation of 'super-freeswan'. It is in maintanance mode,
> meaning no active development happens there.
> 
> Openswan-2 is th current tree. Openswan-2.0.0 is based on freeswan-2.0x
> (before they removed AH support)
> 
> > I know 1.0.1 have X.509, AES, NAT-T, XAUTH, DPD these features, 2.1.0 also
> > have these features except supporting 2.6?

Does AES work with the native stack ? 

> 
> Openswan-2 has support for the 2.6 kernel. The 1 series do not.
> Openswan-2 has X.509 and XAUTH. AES is being worked on in a seperate cvs branch. 
> NAT-T should be in the 2.1 either already or very soon. DPD still needs to go in.
> 
> For up to date information, use the cvs:
> 
> http://www.openswan.org/development/cvs.php
> 
> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.openswan.org
> http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040312/82775337/attachment.bin