[Openswan Users] OpenSWAN - so dang hard to implement?! Help!
Ken Bantoft
ken at xelerance.com
Tue Mar 2 02:38:39 CET 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yea, www.openswan.org has directions on getting the 2.x tree from
anonymous CVS. We're going to release a 2.1.0rc1 in the next 48 hours or
so.
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Doran Barton wrote:
> Not long ago, Michael Richardson proclaimed...
> > 2.0.0 does not have NAT-traversal.
> > 2.1.0 will.
>
> My next question should be pretty obvious: When will 2.1.0 be out? Is NAT-T
> in some pre-2.1.0 CVS stuff I can check out and play with?
>
> -=Fozz
>
>
- --
Ken Bantoft VP Business Development
ken at xelerance.com Xelerance Corporation
sip://toronto.xelerance.com http://www.xelerance.com
The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet.
-- William Gibson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAQ+WiPiOgilmwgkgRAqK+AJ44vrHrIXWMilhhLVGdws5JsCLj3QCgye6z
Z9EviVOQWRX+/sfWaZqm8EM=
=ZS03
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Users
mailing list