[Openswan Users] OpenSWAN - so dang hard to implement?! Help!

Ken Bantoft ken at xelerance.com
Tue Mar 2 02:38:39 CET 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Yea, www.openswan.org has directions on getting the 2.x tree from 
anonymous CVS.  We're going to release a 2.1.0rc1 in the next 48 hours or 
so.


On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Doran Barton wrote:

> Not long ago, Michael Richardson proclaimed...
> >   2.0.0 does not have NAT-traversal.
> >   2.1.0 will.
> 
> My next question should be pretty obvious: When will 2.1.0 be out? Is NAT-T
> in some pre-2.1.0 CVS stuff I can check out and play with?
> 
> -=Fozz
> 
> 

- -- 
Ken Bantoft			VP Business Development
ken at xelerance.com		Xelerance Corporation
sip://toronto.xelerance.com	http://www.xelerance.com

The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet. 
        -- William Gibson

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAQ+WiPiOgilmwgkgRAqK+AJ44vrHrIXWMilhhLVGdws5JsCLj3QCgye6z
Z9EviVOQWRX+/sfWaZqm8EM=
=ZS03
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Users mailing list