[Openswan Users] Openswan connection difficulties

Steve Wakelin steve at wcsl.net
Wed Jun 30 17:16:11 CEST 2004


Jacco,

Excellent.  Removing the leftsubnet established the connection ;-)

But I'm back to this again

route-host output: /usr/local/lib/ipsec/_updown: doroute `ip route add
62.49.34.242/32 via 62.49.34.242 dev ipsec0 ' failed (RTNETLINK answers:
Network is unreachable)

Which is resolved by

# ip route add 62.49.34.242 dev ipsec0

Suppose I'd better start investigating l2tp servers and their
interoperability with Samba....

Regards

/Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Jacco de Leeuw [mailto:jacco2 at dds.nl] 
Sent: 30 June 2004 15:46
To: Openswan Users
Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] Openswan connection difficulties

Steve Wakelin wrote:

> conn sisl
>    left=213.232.93.110
>    leftsubnet=172.16.200.2/32
>    leftcert=www.sfpost.net.pem
>    right=%any
>    rightcert=mail.sis-l.com.pem
>    leftprotoport=17/0
>    rightprotoport=17/1701
>    auto=add
>    pfs=no
> 
> Jun 30 15:26:31 p4-7165 pluto[15750]: "sisl"[3] 62.49.34.242 #3:
cannot
> respond to IPsec SA request because no connection is known for
> 213.232.93.110[C=GB, ST=Hertfordshire, L=Harpenden, O=WCSL,
OU=sfbackup,
> CN=www.sfpost.net, E=support at wcsl.net,S=C]:17/0...62.49.34.242[C=GB,
> ST=Hertfordshire, L=Harpenden, O=WCSL, OU=sfbackup, CN=mail.sis-l.com,
> E=support at wcsl.net,S=C]:17/1701

This is a configuration for L2TP over IPsec. Are you sure you want that
and not Marcus Mueller's IPSEC.EXE?

For L2TP/IPsec you need an L2TP server and you will also have to remove
the
leftsubnet= line.

Jacco
-- 
Jacco de Leeuw                         mailto:jacco2 at dds.nl
Zaandam, The Netherlands           http://www.jacco2.dds.nl


More information about the Users mailing list