[Openswan Users] RE: Users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 40

[Chris Hudlet]

Thanks for pointing that out Emiliano, I did see it, but was thinking that
since 2.1.1 was the more advanced tree it already had that functionality.  I
guess I am still under that impression after reading Kens reply below.

So Ken, am I reading your reply correctly?  2.1.1 does or does not have "
snprintf() fixes - Supports both RSASig and PSK Roadwarriors at the same
time" ?

If it does, would you be kind enough to educate me on the configs necessary
to make it work or at least point me to the documentation?

Many thanks in advance.

Chris.

 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 17:23:14 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Ken Bantoft <ken at xelerance.com>
> Subject: Re: [Openswan Users] Static & Roadwarrior connections?
> To: Emiliano Castagnari - MOST <ecastagn at most.com.ar>
> Cc: users at lists.openswan.org
> Message-ID:
> 	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0404291718440.6711-100000 at tla.xelerance.com>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Emiliano Castagnari - MOST wrote:
> 
> > El  [ Thu 29, Apr 04 - 08:23 ] , Chris Hudlet expreso:
> 
> >
> > 2004-04-04 	Openswan 1.0.3 released
> >
> >     * Adds support for 2.4.25 kernels (snprintf changes),
> >     * *new feature* Supports both RSASig and PSK Roadwarriors at the
> same time
> > 	[snip]
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Now this might sound strange in some way, but OpenSwan 2.1.1 was
> released 2004/03/21.
> > Could someone explain this to me ?
> 
> There are 2 trees - 1.x for Kernels 2.2, 2.4, which is based off the Super
> FreeS/WAN codebase.  2.x, for Kernels 2.4 and 2.6 which is based initially
> off FreeS/WAN 2.04 code.  We backport bits from the 2.x tree into 1.x
> tree, such as these snprintf() fixes.
> 
> 
> - --
> Ken Bantoft			VP Business Development
> ken at xelerance.com		Xelerance Corporation
> sip://toronto.xelerance.com	http://www.xelerance.com
> 
> The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet.