[Openswan Users] NAT-T transport mode & virtual_private

Matthew Callaway matt-openswan at kindjal.net
Mon Apr 26 13:13:22 CEST 2004


Just a quick note to say "Me too" regarding this problem.

It works with one addr, not with more than one.

Matt

Gene Hand ghand at pestructural.com wrote:

> - I was also trying to use the virtual_private directive as documented
> in Mathieu's patch.  This had worked for me before with super freeswan
> but now if I try to use:
>
> "virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:!192.168.1.0/24"
>
> I get "3 bad entries in virtual_private - none loaded".  If I only use
> one at a time, ie "virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8" it doesn't
> complain, but I can't seem to get any more than that.  For now I've
> just setup separate entries with a rightsubnetwithin parameter for
> each private subnet.  There's a probably a better way to do it but
> that's working for me at the moment..  anyone else run into this?




More information about the Users mailing list