[Openswan Users] NAT-T transport mode & virtual_private
Matthew Callaway
matt-openswan at kindjal.net
Mon Apr 26 13:13:22 CEST 2004
Just a quick note to say "Me too" regarding this problem.
It works with one addr, not with more than one.
Matt
Gene Hand ghand at pestructural.com wrote:
> - I was also trying to use the virtual_private directive as documented
> in Mathieu's patch. This had worked for me before with super freeswan
> but now if I try to use:
>
> "virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:!192.168.1.0/24"
>
> I get "3 bad entries in virtual_private - none loaded". If I only use
> one at a time, ie "virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8" it doesn't
> complain, but I can't seem to get any more than that. For now I've
> just setup separate entries with a rightsubnetwithin parameter for
> each private subnet. There's a probably a better way to do it but
> that's working for me at the moment.. anyone else run into this?
More information about the Users
mailing list