[Openswan Users] NAT on both ends

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
Tue Apr 6 11:02:10 CEST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "nguez" == nguez  <Antonio> writes:
    nguez> I'm trying to connect a Windows VPN client which is behind a
    nguez> NAT router to a openswan server which also is behind another
    nguez> NAT router.  Somebody has made work something like that?
    nguez> It's feasible that this double NAT scenary will work or I
    nguez> need to redesign the network structure?

  In theory, it can be made to work if the NAT boxes will permit you to
forward ports.  In practice, it is a disaster.

  You would be wisest to redesign the network. Make the openswan box do
the NAT. 

  (btw, the term "double NAT" usually means:

	client---NAT1----NAT2====Internet )

- --
]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBQHK4YIqHRg3pndX9AQFHXQQA4G9NG95pxc4GtVC2VE92lRAKtnGZzfkt
eSbBwC2+AtKLvYxM+vd7i+KjwKpZ3cdkDHgd4V+UMykSOqKet9OEO0Sy2d3bfiB7
Fb6aUJghaJ83gwr2zEEBi7crh51sAUIwKTuTJ76eeA7g4toL5KFv1Tuzz8zAfjOe
zhi3T/9e2hM=
=a9oF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Users mailing list