[Openswan dev] wiki page for configs

Harald Jenny harald at a-little-linux-box.at
Thu Oct 7 04:07:00 EDT 2010


On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:07:27AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
> 
> Jivin Harald Jenny lays it down ...
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 10:44:35AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > > 
> > > >maybe a silly idea but how do you think about putting together a page with user
> > > >created config examples like the one from Adam Crane posted on users? As far as
> > > >I can tell this seems to be one of the greatest drawbacks for new users that we
> > > >lack a central knowledge base... maybe we should also put up the manpages (or
> > > >xml-files) on the webpage (preferable done automatically for the current active
> > > >release). How do you think about this?
> > > 
> > > We do ship those as "examples". A source install gives you /etc/ipsec.d/examples/
> > > and a fedora install gives those examples in /usr/share/doc/openswan-2*/*
> > 
> > /etc/ipsec.d/examples$ ls -1
> > hub-spoke.conf
> > ipv6.conf
> > l2tp-cert.conf
> > l2tp-cert-orgWIN2KXP.conf
> > l2tp-psk.conf
> > l2tp-psk-orgWIN2KXP.conf
> > linux-linux.conf
> > no_oe.conf
> > oe-exclude-dns.conf
> > sysctl.conf
> > xauth.conf
> > 
> > These are the files available under debian... how much are there supposed to
> > be?
> > 
> > > 
> > > But yes, we're still looking at migrating a lot of documentation and examples into
> > > the redmine based wiki to replace www.openswan.org.
> > 
> > Well the examples in /etc/ipsec.d/examples are nice but they do not really
> > cover much real world scenarios... for example a star-based IPSec structure for
> > a HQ and some other locations or the necessary quirks to use IPSecuritas under
> > MacOS with openswan server - you can find these examples in the web but only
> > when searching for a while.
> > 
> > > If there are volunteers who
> > > want to help with that, let me know.
> > 
> > *handup*
> > 
> > > documentation is hard to find people for.
> > 
> > Yes for sure, but without good documentation how are people supposed to really
> > use this software?
> > 
> > > Once
> > > they know too much, they tend to drop the documentation part (guilty as charged)
> > 
> > Me too - I think most important is to fix things we discover (for example the
> > issue you found concerning missing the protostack= line which results in MAST
> > being used).
> 
> Actually,  just looked through the top level README in the source,  that
> could do with an update as well,  INSTALL is actually better for most people.
> I am happy to have a go at it if everyone agrees.

Agreed - maybe insert a pointer to the wiki?

> 
> Cheers,
> Davidm

Kind regards
Harald

> 
> -- 
> David McCullough,      david_mccullough at mcafee.com,  Ph:+61 734352815
> McAfee - SnapGear      http://www.mcafee.com         http://www.uCdot.org


More information about the Dev mailing list