[Openswan dev] Support for hardware random number generators

Vrabete, Brad brad.vrabete at intel.com
Thu Nov 20 06:07:17 EST 2008

Hi David,

Thanks for the insight.

I want to follow-up on what I have said about the OCF thread for generating
random numbers. What I have noticed was that on a system with hard disk,
when the disk gets accessed, the thread function is not getting called
because the entropy pool is never empty. Basically, the function is called
only once, when the OCF module starts. 

I was thinking of finding a way to disable the filling entropy pool when a
HW RNG (proper one) is present. What do you think?


>-----Original Message-----
>From: David McCullough [mailto:David_Mccullough at securecomputing.com] 
>Sent: 20 November 2008 00:56
>To: Paul Wouters
>Cc: Vrabete, Brad; dev at openswan.org
>Subject: Re: [Openswan dev] Support for hardware random number 
>Jivin Paul Wouters lays it down ...
>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Vrabete, Brad wrote:
>> > That's exactly what I'm running now  but I'm concerned 
>about performance:
>> > rngd is running in the user space and all these user space 
>to kernel 
>> > (and
>> > back) transfers are using processor time.  I was trying to find a 
>> > way to use a proper HW RNG (no streams of 0, FIPS 
>compliant) without 
>> > having to use rngd.
>> You'd have to move FIPS compliance into the kernel. And 
>Linus does not 
>> want policy into the kernel....
>Fair call,  OCF has a "pseudo fips" test on all RNG data it 
>pushes into the kernel.
>It's not just Linus either, the general consensus from most 
>kernel people on the topic is that your HW RNG data should be 
>pushed to user space and back.  So happens I don't agree, 
>especially on small embedded systems ;-)
>> > I know OCF adds that but the OCF function does not get called on a 
>> > system with a HD, due to the way Linux's entropy pool is 
>filled (on 
>> > every disk access and/or interrupt). Any suggestions?
>> Perhaps OCF could get a hook to do this? David?
>I don't believe that is the case any more.  Current OCF 
>versions put directly into the entropy pool from the HW and 
>keep the pool full.
>Unfortunately you need kernel patches to do this.
>> > Are you using get_random_bytes in Openswan?  
>> That is used at various places, yes. (KLIPS, not sure about 
>> don't think it does)
>The OCF stuff fills the standard pools,  so in kernel and 
>userspace will benefit,
>David McCullough,  david_mccullough at securecomputing.com,   
>Ph:+61 734352815
>Secure Computing - SnapGear  http://www.uCdot.org   
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6671 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20081120/e388aa78/attachment.bin 
-------------- next part --------------
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: One Spencer Dock, North Wall Quay, Dublin 1
Registered Number: 308263
Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

More information about the Dev mailing list