[Openswan dev] openswan 2.1.0rc1 rpms

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Mar 9 23:24:20 CET 2004


On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:14:17PM -0500, Sam Sgro wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 March 2004 12:09, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > OK, adjusted accordingly. The resulting kernels can be found at
> >
> >     http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/name/kernel/
> >
> > (the ones with the "_39" tag).
> >
> > But it has already been reported that these still have no NAT-T
> > support (ESPINUDP(1) not supported by kernel). What did I do wrong?
> 
> Fedora Core 1 does not natively provide the UDP encapsulation needed for NAT 
> Traversal. I think Paul was referring to the upcoming FC2, which will have a 
> 2.6 kernel.

So NAT-T will work only with 2.6 (and 2.4 with backported 2.6 ipsec
code like RHEL)? Is there no ESPINUDP patch for 2.4?

That's what I thought I was buying when applying
openswan-2.1.0rc1.kern.patch.gz to the 2.4 kernel. In
http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/dev/2004-January/000013.html
mcr explained that the patch for 2.0.0dr3 did contain the NAT-T parts.

What am I missing?

(obviously a patch ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20040309/a9f4e5f7/attachment.bin


More information about the Dev mailing list